Perspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences

        Scientific data analyses often combine several computational tools in automated pipelines, or workflows. Thousands of such workflows have been used in the life sciences, though their composition has remained a cumbersome manual process due to a lack of standards for annotation, assembly, and implementation. Recent technological advances have returned the long-standing vision of automated workflow composition into focus.
        This article summarizes a recent Lorentz Center workshop dedicated to automated composition of workflows in the life sciences. We survey previous initiatives to automate the composition process, and discuss the current state of the art and future perspectives. We start by drawing the “big picture” of the scientific workflow development life cycle, before surveying and discussing current methods, technologies and practices for semantic domain modelling, automation in workflow development, and workflow assessment. Finally, we derive a roadmap of individual and community-based actions to work toward the vision of automated workflow development in the forthcoming years.
        A central outcome of the workshop is a general description of the workflow life cycle in six stages: 1) scientific question or hypothesis, 2) conceptual workflow, 3) abstract workflow, 4) concrete workflow, 5) production workflow, and 6) scientific results. The transitions between stages are facilitated by diverse tools and methods, usually incorporating domain knowledge in some form. Formal semantic domain modelling is hard and often a bottleneck for the application of semantic technologies. However, life science communities have made considerable progress here in recent years and are continuously improving, renewing interest in the application of semantic technologies for workflow exploration, composition and instantiation. Combined with systematic benchmarking with reference data and large-scale deployment of production-stage workflows, such technologies enable a more systematic process of workflow development than we know today. We believe that this can lead to more robust, reusable, and sustainable workflows in the future.


DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.54159.1

Teams: FAIR Computational Workflows

Publication type: Journal

Journal: F1000Research

Citation: F1000Res 10:897

Date Published: 2021

Registered Mode: by DOI

Authors: Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Magnus Palmblad, Jon Ison, Veit Schwämmle, Mohammad Sadnan Al Manir, Ilkay Altintas, Christopher J. O. Baker, Ammar Ben Hadj Amor, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, Paulos Charonyktakis, Michael R. Crusoe, Yolanda Gil, Carole Goble, Timothy J. Griffin, Paul Groth, Hans Ienasescu, Pratik Jagtap, Matúš Kalaš, Vedran Kasalica, Alireza Khanteymoori, Tobias Kuhn, Hailiang Mei, Hervé Ménager, Steffen Möller, Robin A. Richardson, Vincent Robert, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Robert Stevens, Szoke Szaniszlo, Suzan Verberne, Aswin Verhoeven, Katherine Wolstencroft

help Submitter
Lamprecht, A.-L., Palmblad, M., Ison, J., Schwämmle, V., Al Manir, M. S., Altintas, I., Baker, C. J. O., Ben Hadj Amor, A., Capella-Gutierrez, S., Charonyktakis, P., Crusoe, M. R., Gil, Y., Goble, C., Griffin, T. J., Groth, P., Ienasescu, H., Jagtap, P., Kalaš, M., Kasalica, V., … Wolstencroft, K. (2021). Perspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences. In F1000Research (Vol. 10, p. 897). F1000 Research Ltd.

Views: 1623

Created: 1st Dec 2021 at 21:35

Last updated: 16th Jan 2023 at 13:34

help Attributions


Powered by
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH